‘Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief’: Barely strikes once
February 12, 2010“Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief” may have the most unfortunate movie title since “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire.”
It’s too long, for starters. (What’s the matter? Didn’t have the guts to put a “Part 1” in the title?) And it indicates that the movie is about a character named Percy. Yikes.
Of course, because this is a movie about Greek mythology (though set in the present day), Percy is actually short for Perseus, the demigod who killed Medusa and rode Pegasus. Mythology – so popular with the young people today.
Still, that title still sounds like a wee bit of a marketing challenge.
But then, I’m not a parent of a kid who wants to see this movie because it’s based on the first in a kids’ series of adventure novels by Rick Riordan. I assume that the books are an attempt to trap the same publishing magic as J.K. Rowling did with the Harry Potter books.
I’m sure the publishers would argue about the Potter comparison, saying that the template is mythology and not magic: gods, demi-gods, furies and the like. But get serious: It’s pure Harry, from the revelation that teen-age Percy has powers he never knew about to the Hogwarts-like camp where he learns to use said powers to the Dumbledore-like teacher (in this case, the centaur Chiron, played by Pierce Brosnan) who helps him achieve his destiny.
It’s even directed by Chris Columbus, who directed the first two Potter films. Which means it’s fast, flat and punchline-challenged, despite the presence of Brandon T. Jackson (who played the hilarious Alpa Chino in “Tropic Thunder”). As a satyr who has yet to earn his horns, Jackson is buried under the weight of soggy one-liners and mushy, generic dialogue.
But why should he be alone? The script by Craig Titley is all about the action sequences, with little thought to giving the dialogue even the semblance of a polish. There are plenty of opportunities for humor but the jokes just lay there, as if they’d been subjected to Medusa’s stony gaze.
The plot, such as it is, concerns an impending war between Zeus (Sean Bean) and his brother, Poseidon (Kevin McKidd). Zeus’ lightning bolt has been stolen and he blames Poseidon’s human offspring. If it isn’t returned in 14 days, by thunder … well, you get the idea.
Poseidon’s offspring? That would be Percy Jackson (Logan Lerman), a kid with dyslexia and ADHD (but an amazing ability to hold his breath underwater for seven minutes or more at a time). He doesn’t know who his real father is or that he’s a demigod until a school trip to the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s antiquities room. There, a substitute teacher turns into a Fury and attacks him, screaming for him to return the lightning bolt. Except that Percy didn’t steal it.
So Percy is hustled off to demi-god training camp by his best friend Grover (Jackson), who drags himself around their high school on a pair of crutches, it turns out, to disguise the fact that he’s actually got goat legs. The camp apparently is in those famous mountains of Long Island, given the route his mother (Catherine Keener) takes across one of the bridges of lower Manhattan.
But just as they reach the camp, they’re attacked by a minotaur sent by Hades; Harry’s, er, Percy’s mother is whisked away to Hell.
Percy must train and learn to use his abilities so he can go on a quest blah blah blah. The quest involves him, Grover (Jackson) and a daughter of Athena named Annabeth (Alexandra Daddario) – in other words, Harry, Ron and Hermione.
Oh yes, and a bevy of movie stars. There’s Uma Thurman as Medusa, Rosario Dawson as Persephone and, in the film’s only funny sequence, Steve Coogan as a heavy-metal-rock-star-styled Hades.
It’s not awful – it’s just not particularly inspired. Lerman is an interesting young actor, as he showed in last year’s little seen “My One and Only,” though he has little to work with here. Neither does Jackson, who is stuck making lame jokes – on crutches, no less. And, with the exception of Coogan, the adults have apparently been instructed to play the gods as very serious people, minus any twinkle of humor. Only McKidd evinces a bit of emotion, with a moment in which he explains his lifelong absence to Percy.
There must be some fun in the literary series somewhere. But it’s been lost in the translation from page to screen – and something tells me this movie won’t be inspiring a sequel anytime soon.





February 12th, 2010 at 1:57 pm
Reading your review of “Percy Jackson”, as well as others, it sounds like “Percy Jackson” butchers Greek Mythology as much as “Troy” did. (2004, Written by David Benioff. Directed by Wolfgang Petersen). Full Disclosure: Having studied Greek Mythology for almost 38 years, I have some strongly held convictions about film adaptations of Greek Myth.
Every time I see the ad for your biography “Bloody Sam” (which I read back in the 90′s and liked very much), I remember my experience of seeing “The Wild Bunch” at the Pix Theater, on Hollywood Blvd., in July, 1969 , when I was living in California, in Santa Monica, and working as a (non-union) film editor. When William Holden, as Pike Bishop, spat out the words: “If they move, kill ‘em”, and the credit snaps onto the screen: “Directed by Sam Peckinpah”, my friends and I knew we were in for a very different Western movie-watching experience then we’d had before. A hunch certainly fulfilled by the opening bank robbery sequence.
Thank you for your film reviews and your Web Site.
Sincerely,
David Thompson
February 12th, 2010 at 2:14 pm
Haven’t seen the movie, but I read the book, umm, for cultural and academic purposes and NOT because I’m an adult who just loves to read kid’s books. That said, I did like the Harry Potter series (books and film) very much and the comparison is inevitable, I suppose. There are similarities here, but this series is no Harry Potter.
In fact, the most glaring difference I noticed was this exact issue of witty dialogue and overall polish of interaction between the characters. Opportunities seem to have been missed to create a distinct depth between the main characters whether through intimate conversation or genuine humor… it is not, then surprising that this is the case with the movie. You mentioned that there must be fun in the series… I read all of the books looking for that fun and never really found it.
Having not seen the movie, I would have like to heard about the special effects, etc. I did think while reading the book how visually interesting some of the scenes would be. I guess I’ll have to pony up and see for myself.
February 12th, 2010 at 3:12 pm
I read the books; they were filled with smart-alek, funny humor. This movie butchered it. It left out every possible important element from the book (with the exception of the trio and Luke). It added in a few side plots that weren’t in the book, and frankly were a lot weaker than the book. I would say it was awful, but I probably went in with high expectations.
February 12th, 2010 at 8:46 pm
This sounds like it kills the series several times over.
This is sad. The book series is great. I’ve seen part of it, and it looks idiotic.
February 13th, 2010 at 10:31 pm
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO…dissapointed,The worst movie of the year..waited so long…read the books twice..nothing at all like the book, all the best parts were left out, new plots were horrible..paid $11.75 and feel I was robbed..should have waited for the dvd release which I’m sure will be out soon, and even then will not buy or rent it….
February 14th, 2010 at 3:04 am
@David Thompson:
Actually, the book series is very faithful to Greek mythology. I can attest to this from my own 5 years of studying Latin. Rick Riordan made a point of it.
February 15th, 2010 at 5:08 pm
How many ways can you say awful? Hummm…There’s dreadful, inane, inept, lame…
From the first reveal of Percy’s true identity it fell flat over and over again.A humorous and engaging story you might ask…Not in the least?
I groaned through out every middling exchange,between the wooden actors, that the script kept spitting out every few pages. Actually getting uncomfortable and hoping for it to end well before it did.
Don’t waste your time…
February 16th, 2010 at 5:39 am
I don’t know why everyone is making fun of the tital its bassed on the books, which is amazing. now the books has WAY more hummor and a LOT better. the movie took an AMAZING book and butchered it. i left the theator pissed and saying ‘ beep this moive i HATE it’ i expected BETTER u think they learned 4rm before.. apperently not. i’m suprized it got a ok to relase it at all.
*~ashley~*
February 28th, 2010 at 3:17 am
My 10 year old son and I have read almost this entire book series and were very excited to see this movie together. We were so disappointed (I am actually feeling furious that as a family of 5, we spent $45 to see such a ridiculous excuse for a movie). This movie is akin to the naming of the sci-fi series, Star Trek The Next Generation, so it could ride the coat-tails of the cult-popular original Star Trek. Other than using the names of the characters from the book, the movie is completely different. I believe in artistic license and the necessity to alter certain scenarios to translate an idea more effectively on screen, but you can’t alter who is good/bad and not ever mention who is actually the real evil character and change then entire plot. The entire movie was a falsehood. It was more than obvious that no one from the producers to the actors had ever read the book.
In the book series, Percy meets with the Oracle and is sent on the quest by the gods to recover the stolen lightening bolt. He is specifically forbidden to be in the air or wear the flying shoes lest Zeus be able to harm him. Poseidon sends a messenger to give Percy all three pearls- his adventure is in trying to travel across the country to reach the underworld. He never visits a Parthenon replica, nor does he fight a hydra. When he kills Medusa, he mails her head to Olympus and is never in possession of it. The movie never even mentions Ares- the god who is being used by Kronos (the real bad guy) and is ultimately in possession of the lightening bolt as well as Hades’ helm of darkness. Percy actually curries favor with Hades for returning the helm and thus wins his mother’s freedom. Persephone is also specifically mentioned as not being in the underworld (as it is summer) and that Percy would feel more comfortable is she were there. Lastly- Percy makes the journey alone to Olympus (not with Annabeth) and meets with only Zeus and Poseidon. Oh, one more thing, in the end Percy’s mother purposely turns her awful husband into a stone statue using Medusa’s head, sells it, and uses the money to go to college.
All I can say is I considered demanding my money back. Absolutely awful movie from the script to the acting. If you have ever read the book, you can hardly concentrate on the movie because everything is WRONG. If you haven’t read the book, I’m quite sure this pathetic movie will not make you want to read it. I would highly recommend the book series for children/young adults- told in the first person, by a 12 year old, it is quite funny and a fairly straight forward read. It’s humor kind of reminds me of the Wimpy Kid series.
March 8th, 2010 at 4:16 am
Watch the film today, film is good and story is previsible.
I do not know with what they shot the movie with but the image is not very good maybe a digital 2k movie ?
I see it in a theater in 35mm but the image look like little soft and not sharp.
December 9th, 2010 at 3:22 am
You visited my school today, so I thought it would be interesting to actually check out your reviews. Unfortunately, I haven’t seen a new movie since Percy Jackson. Anyway…
I agree with your take on the title, it was too long. However, I don’t think the film was as lifeless as you reviewed it to be. It certainly didn’t live up to the book series, but was able to stand on it’s own. The story wasn’t too complicated and that was fine for the young audience that it was marketed to. The film’s makers knew that the only people who could truely enjoy it were kids who wouldn’t focus on the mythology, the acting, or changes from the book. The book fans and YA readers that already understood the concepts felt the story was unoriginal and boring. AS soon as it was released, it was doomed to fail.
I think the movie just ended up as a giant advertisement for the book.