Marshall Fine Movies for Smart People Hollywood and Fine
 
Home        Reviews        Interviews        Commentary        My Books        Bio        Mission Statement
 
 
Reviews
 
 

November 17, 2011

‘The Descendants’: The year’s best


I’ll say it flat out – Alexander Payne’s new film, “The Descendants,” is my favorite of the year, a movie that manages to be heart-breaking and laugh-out-loud funny at the same time.

Adapted from a novel by Kaui Hart Hemming, “The Descendants” is about dealing with the past while confronting the present and contemplating the future. It is a story of family disaster and salvation, a mystery wrapped in a tragedy and overlaid with the most human comedy.

It also features one of the best performances of George Clooney’s career, a portrayal of sublime depth and simplicity. No mannerisms, no playing on his obvious glamour – just a character dealing with all manner of pain and confusion without obviously falling apart because, well, he simply has to keep it together.

Clooney plays Matt King, a successful real-estate lawyer on the Big Island of Hawaii and a born-and-bred Hawaiian, though more haole than native. As the film begins, he is dealing with one immediate crisis and one impending one.

The immediate earth-shatterer is the fact that his wife, Elizabeth, has suffered a head injury in a speedboat accident. She is comatose in a hospital and, early on, the doctor tells him that, in fact, she’s not going to come back. Plus she has an advance directive in her will, calling for her to be taken off life support so that, as her father (Robert Forster) says to Matt, “she won’t just lay there and spoil – like milk.”

Matt’s task is to tell his two daughters: Scottie (Amara Walker), 10, and Alexandra (Shailene Woodley), who appears to be about 16. He retrieves Alexandra from the boarding school to which she’s been sent to help her straighten out from bad grades and casual drug use. Alexandra, however, is not a lot of comfort, harboring resentments that stem from an argument she had with her mother the last time she was home.

What about? As she reveals to Matt, she caught her mother sneaking around with another man, something about which Matt was completely clueless. And suddenly, even as he pulls the plug on his wife and waits for her to die, Matt becomes obsessed with this other man: with finding him, with laying eyes on him, with somehow finding out what it was about this guy that tempted his wife into leaving him.

Not that there aren’t clues. Matt himself admits that they had been distant because he spent so much time on his work. He was also, in his own words, stingy; though he has a huge family trust, he makes it a point of pride only to live on the income from his law practice, so as not to spoil his girls. The ultimate ant, working while the world of grasshoppers played around him.

Before he gets the bad news that Elizabeth won’t recover, however, he’s already mentally vowing to change his ways. Which brings in the impending problem:

Matt’s family, descendants of some of the original Anglo settlers of Hawaii who married native Hawaiian royalty, owns a huge parcel of undeveloped land on Kauai, which trust laws are forcing them to sell. The high bid from developers is a half-billion dollars; the low bid isn’t much south of that. If Elizabeth will just come out of the coma, Matt promises God, he’ll loosen the purse strings, spend money on her and his daughters, stop working and enjoy life.

Too late. And, even as he stews about that other man, Matt is facing a major meeting with his numerous cousins, all of whom will get a share when they sell the land. But Matt is the sole trustee – the guy in charge of making the decision about which deal to make. His cousins’ definitions of life-and-death issues suddenly are much different than his.

Payne has an amazing filmography, beginning with the sly “Citizen Ruth,” through “Election,” “About Schmidt” and “Sideways.” He is a master of understatement, evoking powerful emotions with subtle and quiet moments. That’s particularly true here, where wrenching feelings are in play but big outward expressions of them aren’t.

He is also outstanding at switching gears in a blink. One example: As Matt makes the rounds, telling people that Elizabeth is not going to make it so they should go say their goodbyes now, he asks Alexandra to accompany him. Her price: dragging along a pal named Sid (Nick Krause), a seemingly clownish doofus whose laidback stoner affect is good for a number of laughs.

But then, in a scene in which a desperate Matt asks Sid for advice in the middle of the night, though Payne lets Sid get his laughs, he also unexpectedly deepens the character in surprising ways. It changes Matt’s view of Sid – and ours – without calling attention to itself.

Payne draws amazing work out of Clooney, who, like Tom Hanks, took a few years to find his groove as a movie actor after years on TV. But with his Oscar-winning work in “Syriana” and his nominated performances in “Michael Clayton” and “Up in the Air,” he has found his sweet spot, playing flawed men who are only too aware of their shortcomings.

He makes Matt King something else altogether: a cautious achiever, someone who seems hard to imagine ever having any self-generated fun. Indeed, though the character talks about surfing while he was in law school, it’s not hard to visualize him setting the alarm on his wristwatch so he can get back to the books on time, never allowing himself to have too much fun. George Clooney as a drudge? Absolutely; he’s fascinatingly believable as a guy who is smart about everything except the human heart.

The rest of the cast is equally good, particularly Woodley as a teen whose emotional maturity outstrips her father’s, despite her wild-child ways. Judy Greer turns in the kind of small, tangy performance that is always Oscar bait, as does Forster, as Clooney’s gruff father-in-law. It’s a superb ensemble cast, from top to bottom.

It’s a shame – though understandable – that Fox Searchlight has gone out of its way to fill its commercials for “The Descendants” with spoilers, giving away crucial plot points and jokes from the film. It wasn’t necessary. There are any number of ways you could have sold this film without strip-mining it of its most potent moments or plot points.

So, anytime you see Clooney’s face pop up in a commercial for this film, change the channel. Then head straight for your local theater to see “The Descendants,” hands-down the best film of 2011. Period.

Print This Post Print This Post
Share

 


6 Responses to “‘The Descendants’: The year’s best”

  1. Sherra Says:

    Love the story. Do’t like Clooney. Wish it was another actor.

  2. Captcliff Says:

    Marshall, you are normally a very good reviewer. Don’t you think you went too far in lauding this film in retrospect? Rethink your standards and your title, Movies for Smart People. I dare you to do the unthinkable and watch this mediocre film a second time. It wasn’t terrible. Just not close to being great or the years best. Consider the believability (psychologically and emotionally) of the characters, their range and development, even in the short span of the film. Case in point, Sid, the comic relief. He plays a good stoner, yes, but it’s not believable when he morphs into a wise Yoda. He is a dragged in character that, like his role, is used to embellish the missing parts of the story but ends up standing out like a sore thumb. I cant believe that you didnt notice moments in which even Clooney was wooden and stuck with cliched script. Cmon man,it’s your turn to be real. You really found this to be believable? Sometimes you can have decent individual performances that just dont gel into something cohesive and powerful, thus not authentic. You fell for the hype and the dramatics. Shame on you, bra….(If you eve lived there you would also know why it wasn’t nearly as good as it gets, even with the intentional pallor).

  3. Captcliff Says:

    PS One doesnt need the trailer to give too much away in The Descendants. The movie gives itself away from the beginning, thus no twists, no turns, nothing unexpected. It hangs. like the wilted Plumeria flowers it so purposely depicts, something that looks good, smells pretty good, but you just know its contrived and pulling for its audience tears and viral video like “awwwwww” emotion.

  4. Teresa Says:

    Would love to see this movie. Can’t find it anywhere & cannot find any information about it other than the original ad. It looks like a great movie. Can you please tell me what happened? thank you

  5. TC Says:

    Payne is the master of the hapless man. “About Schmidt” and “Sideways” show another side of men lost without their women. This was a really good movie very entertaining.

  6. Debbie Says:

    “The Descendants” is an excellent film, no doubt about it. But given the mix of golden globe and Oscar buzz I expected a lot more.

    The storyline and the premise of the movie is ideal. In fact, the tagline caught my attention enormously: “trying to reconnect with daughters.” That is exactly the type of movie I like. Instantly, I could tell this was a movie about character development and human connection, usually the type of movies with the greatest potential.

    Unfortunately, it was merely decent, although not special. It felt like the movie built up so much potential, but failed to release it at a certain point within movie. The full movie, for me, felt too introductory in nature. Not necessarily the plot, because the plot does evolve, however the overall “feel” of the movie felt preliminary to a bigger and more dramatic event which never happened.

    It’s tough to explain my feelings towards the movie because the fault wasn’t necessarily technical or specific. But it did linger around and distracted my viewing somewhat. I felt like there was still more to discover in both Clooney’s character and the character of his daughters. Also, I think this element alone impacted on Clooney’s performance. His performance was good, definitely, but again, because I felt like there was more to be explored, naturally, I also felt like his performance could have been added to (but not necessarily improved).

    Given the Oscar buzz of this movie, I have to compare it to other movies of a similar nature. And unfortunately, I didn’t feel like there was sufficient link between the characters…although the potential to reach that connection was established, it was not acted upon in my opinion. Unfortunately I have to say there have been better developed “re-establishing connection” movies.

    All in all, this is an enjoyable movie, but it is missing some important elements which deteriorates the viewing experience to some extent.

    Have a good day!
    Debbie

Leave a Reply

 

 

Subscribe via RSS

Subscribe to
Reviews via Email



blog advertising
is good for you



 

 
 
© 2013 - hollywoodandfine.com - All Rights Reserved -  - Legal - Site Map - designed by FirstCrescent